The Augustana | 96m | 30s | Pangman | DIALOG

What do you think of this project?


  • Total voters
    46
The site as it is now.

69157


69158


69159
 
Some movement on this one:

PERMIT_DATE November 04, 2016
PERMIT_NUMBER 177780780-005
JOB_CATEGORY Commercial Demolition
ADDRESS 10620 - 99 AVENUE NW
NEIGHBOURHOOD DOWNTOWN
JOB_DESCRIPTION To demolish an existing religious building (Augustan Church).
BUILDING_TYPE Religious Buildings (660)
WORK_TYPE (99) Demolition
CONSTRUCTION_VALUE 65,000
ZONING DC2
 
Excited for this one. It will be noticeable from the southwest I believe, unless it aligns with the Annex building.
 
This one is to be rental as well, is it not? Looks like developers are taking notice of the lack of higher end rental in central Edmonton.
 
Site is fenced off now for the old church demo as people have all found new parking that parked in the lot as their notice was for Dec 1.

Nwj4P7S.jpg
Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.26.50 PM_zpsgwuysk7f.png
Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.26.58 PM_zps5ipz3rwh.png
Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.27.05 PM_zpsjjoa08uv.png
Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.27.40 PM_zpskzuktmky.png
Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.27.48 PM_zps1e0tgkkg.png
 

Attachments

  • Nwj4P7S.jpg
    Nwj4P7S.jpg
    92.2 KB · Views: 1,830
  • Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.26.50 PM_zpsgwuysk7f.png
    Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.26.50 PM_zpsgwuysk7f.png
    403.5 KB · Views: 1,882
  • Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.26.58 PM_zps5ipz3rwh.png
    Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.26.58 PM_zps5ipz3rwh.png
    387.9 KB · Views: 2,030
  • Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.27.05 PM_zpsjjoa08uv.png
    Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.27.05 PM_zpsjjoa08uv.png
    477.5 KB · Views: 1,924
  • Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.27.40 PM_zpskzuktmky.png
    Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.27.40 PM_zpskzuktmky.png
    716.3 KB · Views: 1,793
  • Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.27.48 PM_zps1e0tgkkg.png
    Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.27.48 PM_zps1e0tgkkg.png
    711.5 KB · Views: 1,946
I feel it's important to remember that this is another building that could not exist if the airport overlay were still in effect. It wasn't closed just so that we could build towers like JW Marriott & Stantec (not to mention it was closed for other reasons beyond that, but that's outside the scope of this discussion), but to open up the market to more moderately-scaled buildings like this in downtown, Oliver, and other central neighbourhoods, which would not be economical to build as wider, shorter buildings.
 
Oh so true, the flight path and height restriction affected such a huge area and not just for the taller buildings depending on where you look.

I should see if I can dig up the info I had on that airport and its flight radius dealio.
 

Back
Top