News   Apr 03, 2020
 3.8K     2 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 4.3K     0 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 1.2K     0 

Boardwalk-Revillon Revitalization | ?m | 6s | Allied Properties REIT | DIALOG

What do you think of this project?

  • I dislike it

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I dislike it a lot

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    15

Daveography

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
10,155
Reaction score
22,400
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Revillon Building getting some work done. I really hope they sandblast the paint off the brick.

Reference ID: Job No 365622131-002
Description: Exterior Alteration, Interior Alteration, Demolition
Location: 10310 - 102 AVENUE NW
Plan NB1 Blk 3 Lots 169-171
Applicant: DIALOG, CAROLYN KEELEY
Status: Intake Review
Create Date: 6/22/2020 11:48:26 AM
Neighbourhood: DOWNTOWN
 

Daveography

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
10,155
Reaction score
22,400
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Description: To construct exterior and interior alterations to a multi use building and Boardwalk building level 2, level 3 and level 4, Change of use from Educational service to Profession, Financial and Office support service, Revillon Building Level 1, south new tenant, Change of use from Profession, Financial and Office support service to Public Libraries and Culture Exhibits.
Permit date: August 20, 2020
Type: Development Permit
Subtype: Major Development Permit
Category: N/A
Class: Class A
Status: Approved
Address: 10320 - 102 AVENUE NW
Neighbourhood: DOWNTOWN
Zoning: HA
 

Avenuer

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 8, 2019
Messages
1,056
Reaction score
6,518
Location
Central Edmonton
Description: To construct exterior and interior alterations to a multi use building and Boardwalk building level 2, level 3 and level 4, Change of use from Educational service to Profession, Financial and Office support service, Revillon Building Level 1, south new tenant, Change of use from Profession, Financial and Office support service to Public Libraries and Culture Exhibits.
Permit date: August 20, 2020
Type: Development Permit
Subtype: Major Development Permit
Category: N/A
Class: Class A
Status: Approved
Address: 10320 - 102 AVENUE NW
Neighbourhood: DOWNTOWN
Zoning: HA

Indeed (new atrium!):

bw.png
 

Avenuer

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 8, 2019
Messages
1,056
Reaction score
6,518
Location
Central Edmonton
I think the current atrium facade is waaaay more visually interesting than the uninspired glass box in this render. 😕

There might be more to look at with the existing atrium, but to me, I think the KISS (keep it simple silly) principle applies here. I am not a fan of the existing stucco'ed fake 'Greek' column things or 90s window treatments.
 

_Citizen_Dane_

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
415
Reaction score
2,761
Location
Edmonton
There might be more to look at with the existing atrium, but to me, I think the KISS (keep it simple silly) principle applies here. I am not a fan of the existing stucco'ed fake 'Greek' column things or 90s window treatments.
Yeah, that's my thought on it too. I'm all for anything other than plain glass boxes, but the cheap Post-Modern look clashes way too much with the plain utilitarian look of the two existing buildings. I do appreciate them adding two new entrances onto 102nd as well.

I really hope they strip that awful paint of the Revillon Building, it's been peeling for ages now. Here's how nice it could look...
Revillon Building.jpg
 
Last edited:

dunno

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Aug 21, 2020
Messages
108
Reaction score
471
Location
edmonton/winnipeg
There might be more to look at with the existing atrium, but to me, I think the KISS (keep it simple silly) principle applies here. I am not a fan of the existing stucco'ed fake 'Greek' column things or 90s window treatments.

i think the current iteration is certainly more 'fun' in the post-modernist sense but unfortunately a bit dilapidated. tbh i think it'd be better to just clean up and renovate the existing as this reminds me of a stubby version of that development slated for the blue plate block (i think?) as well as other developments in other cities. in other words, it's a trendier design and there's nothing wrong with it. i wouldn't be upset if it were built as shown but i caution against removing "outdated" architecture for simply that reason. it's the same rationale the modernists had with ornate victorian and edwardian era architecture. in terms of pomo, the current atrium isn't really offensive and from what i remember (it's been a while), the interior is pretty decent (though could use some sprucing up i suppose).
 

Top