Sooo…
Premier Danielle Smith says she is now seeking a “second medical opinion” but not for herself, for someone else, perhaps even from a homeopathic naturopath?
Does she think that because she is Premier she is now entitled to someone else’s medical information and entitled to intervene in that person’s healthcare and to do so publicly?
She apparently thinks her duty as Premier is to see that an individual who chooses not to accept a vaccine into her body because she thinks it’s experimental is still entitled to be at the top of the transplant list.
If she wins, it would mean she would be entitled to accept an organ from another human being into her body. According to the latest Alberta Health reports, 90.9% of Albertans over the age of 12 have received at least one shot of that experimental vaccine.
Does the Premier also want to give actual medical treatment advice after she has that second opinion? Perhaps she could suggest that the transplant team infuse the organ with hydroxychloroquine and treat the patient with a round of ivermectin in addition to the sometimes experimental anti-rejection drugs and other measures that are part of the transplant protocol she thinks should be ignored?
This isn’t medicine nor is it assisting a constituent, this is campaign electioneering. This matter has been to the courts already and they have ruled in favour of AHS’s rights to determine medical protocols.
If the Premier isn’t prepared to accept court decisions here, how can she expect us to believe she will accept them elsewhere (ie on sovereignty issues) or is she only prepared to accept court decisions that she agrees with?
Edmonton Journal ePaper offers current issues of Edmonton Journal ePaper.
epaper.edmontonjournal.com
