TAS
Senior Member
I'm thinking they thought of it as an 'Oilers' jersey they were throwing over in disgust as opposed to a McDavid jersey and didn't care what name was on the back of it.
I always hated the idea of throwing jerseys on the ice. It's rude, stupid and accomplishes nothing. I can understand the concept of wanting to "force managements hand" or "show how upset the fans are" but here is a timeline of what you did:
1) You at one point bought a jersey... which is exactly what they want you to do
2) You bought a ticket to the game... which is exactly what they want you to do
3) You embarrassed not only the management but also the true fans of the team, and if your goal is to make things worse, congratulations? I'm no sports psychologist but I have a feeling when the players see a jersey thrown onto the ice it doesn't exactly spark them into playing the best hockey of their lives, it probably gets them down
4) Your jersey throwing is not going to force anything, these are professionals dealing with millions of dollars and the livelihoods of people, they are not going to work any quicker because of something so minuscule as a couple of jerseys thrown on the ice
5) What are the chances that when the team eventually starts doing well again and probably ends up making the playoffs, you buy another jersey? Probably fairly high (and most definitely higher than they should be)... and guess what, thats exactly what they want you to do
Thats fair to say enough is enough, and you're right it's not meant to be logical/rational which is where I struggle sometimes because I make the majority of my decisions based off of logic, so thank you for opening my eyes to that a bit.I personally like it! It puts attention on problems on a team. It's also most likely the measure taken by a person who's incredibly passionate about the team, so much that he or she cannot take a break, and they finally get to a point where enough is enough. Is it logical or rational? No, but that's the point. It's a sign that enough's enough. And I'm willing to bet those people are legitimately DONE with forking out ludicrous amounts of money for a subpar product - good for them.
Sadly though, this is not an effort issue. This is a regression to the mean. All the analytics pointed this year to an absolute tire fire as we have one of the worst D-cores in the entire league. I hope we can make the playoffs, but I also wouldn't be surprised if we tank to bottom 5.
Thats fair to say enough is enough, and you're right it's not meant to be logical/rational which is where I struggle sometimes because I make the majority of my decisions based off of logic, so thank you for opening my eyes to that a bit.
With that being said though if you really want to force change maybe don't buy a ticket to the game. That would do a lot more work if the team stopped making money than if you made them look bad, thats how you truly force a businesses hand. Again though, probably thinking too logically.
Like you said the fans who do it are extremely passionate, believe me on this one, if you're willing to waste hundreds of dollars to do that because you have so much passion for a sports team, you'll waste hundreds more, wouldn't be surprised to see 2/3 people who threw a jersey last night to be wearing one again this time next year.
Just wondering what your observation has been with people around you? You strike me as a very informed and savvy Oilers fan. I've got some friends who were once so passionate about the game they could probably scout for a living. They don't really watch games that much anymore unless it's in the background of a social gathering. I myself didn't even know they Florida game happened until my earlier comment.
He's a below average goaltender in the NHL yes, but he's not that bad, as a passionate fan I've also ripped on him in the past(as have I with almost every played on this roster), but the hate for this guy is way too much. People act like he's the main problem when the poor guy is just a standard backup goaltender, he isn't supposed to be getting this many starts but our supposed #1 has been injured all year long because our GM signed a 40 year old. The Sportsnet panel did talk about him a bit last night and Kevin Bieksa did rip on him.... directly after Kelly Hrudey (former NHL goalie) spoke about mental health for goaltenders. Which for Koskinen is probably pretty bad, when your own coach clearly favours other options over you and blames you for losses in interviews, and then the annoying media team here calls for a new goalie after every loss. It's also not his fault he is being paid 4.5 million, why would he take a pay cut? He was playing well at the time and still new to the squad. His agent got him a lucrative deal that no competent GM in the league would've signed, good on his agent, bad on our front office.The puck hit him a lot! Granted he finally made those 2 or even 3 saves to hold the game, but a few of us watching last night are or were goalies and his positioning, reactions, recovery and puck awareness were still horrific.
I'd love for a panel to breakdown his play from last night's game.,